| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Image Deblurring using Inertial Measurement Sensors |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SIGGRAPH 2010 |
Neel Joshi |      | Sing Bing Kang |      | C. Lawrence Zitnick |      | Richard Szeliski |
|
||||||
  |
An SLR Camera instrumented with our image deblurring attachment that uses inertial measurement sensors and the input image in an “aided blind-deconvolution” algorithm to automatically deblur images with spatially-varying blurs (first two images). A blurry input image (third image) and the result of our method (fourth image). | ||||||||||
Abstract We present a deblurring algorithm that uses a hardware attachment coupled with a natural image prior to deblur images from consumer cameras. Our approach uses a combination of inexpensive gyroscopes and accelerometers in an energy optimization framework to estimate a blur function from the camera’s acceleration and angular velocity during an exposure. We solve for the camera motion at a high sampling rate during an exposure and infer the latent image using a joint optimization. Our method is completely automatic, handles per-pixel, spatially-varying blur, and out-performs the current leading image-based methods. Our experiments show that it handles large kernels – up to at least 100 pixels, with a typical size of 30 pixels. We also present a method to perform “ground-truth” measurements of camera motion blur. We use this method to validate our hardware and deconvolution approach. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that uses 6 DOF inertial sensors for dense, per-pixel spatially-varying image deblurring and the first work to gather dense ground-truth measurements for camera-shake blur.
Examples
|
Slides (23.0 MB) |
Spatially varying vs. spatially invariant PSFs |